GenDoc Study Group Week 2

Mastering Genealogical Documentation Study Group

Chapter Two – Noncitation Aspects of Genealogical Documentation

Marceline Beem

Reference:

Jones, Thomas W. "Noncitation Aspects of Genealogical Documentation." In Mastering Genealogical Documentation, 11-24. Arlington, VA: National Genealogical Society, 2017.

One of my weaknesses in my genealogical writing is linking pieces of evidence together, or fully connecting the dots. It’s not that I don’t have the evidence needed to do that – it’s just that I forget my reader does not know everything that I know, so I sometimes forget to give a full explanation that will make sense to my audience.  This is especially true in writing footnotes with more than one citation, so I appreciated the section of this week's reading that discussed this issue.

One recent example of this is found in my proof argument assignment for ProGen. I wrote one section that discussed indirect evidence from burials at Holy Cross Cemetery in Colma, California. Below are screen shots which show part of the discussion and the corresponding endnotes:

Figure 1. Excerpt of discussion of Haley family burials at Holy Cross Cemetery

Figure 2. Corresponding Endnotes for Figure 1.

One of the questions posed to me during the peer review was "How do you know Charlotte Anderson was Lydia's daughter?"  I thought covered that in the footnote, but oops - and a very big oops - I did not include enough explanatory text to show the relationship.  My final draft changed the endnotes to footnotes (that's a story for another day), and the footnote for for this sentence was revised:

Figure 3.  Revised Footnote for Figure 1.

Notice that in the revised version, I don't just cite the coroner's records, but I state what the coroner reported that supports my assertion that Lydia was buried in the same plot as her daughter. This helps tie the burials and coroner's record together, and strengthens the entire proof argument. 

My takeaway is that when we craft citations, we need to not only answer give the pertinent details of the source's author, publication information, and other relevant details, but sometimes we also need to write an  explanation so that the reader fully understands why we included the source and how it supports our conclusions.

Mastering Genealogical Documentation Study Group: Week 1

Mastering Genealogical Documentation Study Group

Chapter One: The Purpose and Nature of Genealogical Documentation

Marceline Beem

Reference:

Jones, Thomas W. "The Purpose and Nature of Genealogical Documentation." In Mastering Genealogical Documentation, 1-10. Arlington, VA: National Genealogical Society, 2017.


I can't remember a time in my research where documenting my sources wasn't important to me. Some of my earliest readings in compiled genealogies had me scratching my head and asking "How did he know that?" These books were, of course, older books that had no bibliography or works cited sections.


Although I understood the importance of citing my sources, I wasn't always consistent with that part of the research process, probably because I didn't understand the importance of writing my conclusions - outside of putting them into my Legacy file, that is. Now that I'm writing up my research notes and conclusions as I go, having a better understanding of how to craft a citation without relying exclusively on software templates or having to pick up Evidence Explained is one of the areas I'd like to grow in, and one reason I'm excited about being part of this study group.


One of the points that Dr. Jones makes in the first chapter is that citations formats found in guides such as Evidence Explained are great starting places, but sometimes adjustments need to be made, and that's okay.¹ One example of this from my own research came in crafting a citation for the 1850 census listing of my 3rd great-grandfather, James Baldwin, who was living in Duval County, Florida. Here is an image of the census:

James Baldwin family, 1850, Duval County, Florida

Usually a census citation would include the dwelling number and family number, but on this page, those columns are hard to read. Using enhancement tools at both Ancestry.com and FamilySearch did not help. To overcome that, I use the line number and include a notation for the reason for that when I cite this census record.² Making this substitution, the basic citation now looks like this:

1850 U.S. census, Duval County, Florida, population schedule, Thomasville District, page 118 (stamped), line 6, James Baldwin; digital image, FamilySearch.org (http://www.familysearch.org : accessed 24 Sep 2016); citing NARA microfilm publication M432. (The page is hard to read because of faded ink, even when using viewing aids at Ancestry and FamilySearch. In the citation, the line item is used because the dwelling and family numbers are partially illegible.)

This is a simple example of having flexibility in creating citations, but hopefully it helps us start to think through what we are citing,  and go beyond using the style guides as "models and templates to slavishly copy."³
___________________________________________

1. Jones, Thomas W.  Mastering Genealogical Documentation (Arlington, VA: National Genealogical Society, 2017), 5.

2. See the first footnote on my blog post "GPS Study Group Week 2: Where was James Baldwin born?," 40th & Plum (https://40th-and-plum.blogspot.com/2017/01/gps-study-group-week-2-where-was-james.html), published January 22, 2017.

3. Jones, Mastering Genealogical Documentation, 6.